| 1 |
On 29/11/2010, at 5:38pm, James wrote: |
| 2 |
> ... |
| 3 |
>> Without a doubt the result of that darn CPU throttling thingy (CPU |
| 4 |
>> frequency scaling). |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, I did not realize that /proc/cpuinfo was dynamically modified |
| 7 |
> every time a processor changes (power) states....? |
| 8 |
> I thought it was a (static) maximum) based on reading |
| 9 |
> the hardware once. Nice to know it's dynamic. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Do something processor intensive to test. `yes` seems to have bring CPU utilisation to 100% here. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Stroller. |
Archives