| 1 |
search bugs.gentoo.org for "ALL lilypond" and you will see a number of |
| 2 |
bugs, including one referring to an ebuild for 2.7.0. You may also find |
| 3 |
the reason for later versions not being marked stable. The usual reason |
| 4 |
however is lack of developers. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
This aspect of gentoo is getting worse and worse. This is an |
| 7 |
observation. not a complaint. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:44:21 -0300 |
| 11 |
Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Hi, I don't know where should I post this kind of message, but I need |
| 14 |
> to use lilypond as one of my working tools. I got stunned when I saw |
| 15 |
> today that lilypond version available at portage tree is 2.0.3 .... |
| 16 |
> the latest stable version is 2.6.5 and 2.0.3 is extreme old. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Is there a reason that lilypond version is not up to date .... and |
| 19 |
> should I build myself ( without portage ) if I want to used it ? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> An application asked: |
| 23 |
> "Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better", |
| 24 |
> so I´ve installed Linux |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives