1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:16:19 -0600, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Now that I'm basically forced to have a init thingy, that is a |
5 |
>> additional reason not to reboot. In the past, another distro, the init |
6 |
>> thingy would break and I couldn't boot. I despise having to have a init |
7 |
>> thingy. If I ever replace the hard drive that has my OS with a SSD or |
8 |
>> something, the separate /usr is gone. Maybe I can ditch the init thingy |
9 |
>> at that point. |
10 |
> init thingies have changed a lot since your Mandr{ake,iva} experiences. |
11 |
> The way the kernel handles them is very different and the tools used to |
12 |
> build them have changed greatly. Mandrake used their on init thingy |
13 |
> builder, as did most distros, whereas we now have a standardised tool |
14 |
> that works well in a greater range of situations. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I've already had one fail on Gentoo. It was about the 2nd or 3rd time I |
19 |
rebooted after starting to use it. The tools may have changed but the |
20 |
experience hasn't. It's one reason why I make certain to keep older |
21 |
kernels/init thingys around so that I can boot. |
22 |
|
23 |
I don't see me liking the init thingys in my lifetime. I'm to old to |
24 |
start trusting them given the large number of failures I've had. |
25 |
|
26 |
Dale |
27 |
|
28 |
:-) :-) |