Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:26:47 |
| Message-Id: | qo2438$g54$1@blaine.gmane.org |
| 1 | This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and |
| 2 | scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by |
| 3 | sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | What am I missing? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! HELLO, everybody, |
| 9 | at I'm a HUMAN!! |
| 10 | gmail.com |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? | Hartmut Figge <h.figge@×××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? | Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> |