Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael <confabulate@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ISO verification question.
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:34:44
Message-Id: 1682737.VLH7GnMWUR@lenovo.localdomain
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] ISO verification question. by "Γιώργος Κωστόπουλος"
1 Hi Γιώργος,
2
3 On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 20:00:28 GMT Γιώργος Κωστόπουλος wrote:
4 > Hi! :-)
5 >
6 > I just downloaded the minimal installation ISO and I was trying the
7 > verification instructions.
8 > I admit that I'm not any kind of gpg expert, so the results are
9 > somewhat confusing to me.
10 > Can someone shed some light on them?
11 >
12 > Here's console's output:
13 > >gpg --verify install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc
14 >
15 > gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 22 17:01:06 2020 EET
16 > gpg: using RSA key 534E4209AB49EEE1C19D96162C44695DB9F6043D
17 > gpg: Good signature from "Gentoo Linux Release Engineering (Automated
18 > Weekly Release Key) <releng@g.o>" [unknown]
19
20 This is telling you the 'install-amd64-
21 minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc' file which contains hashes of the
22 various files listed in it, has a valid signature - i.e. the hashes of these
23 files have not been tampered with and they have been signed by the owner of
24 the Gentoo Release Engineering key.
25
26 Have a look here for the published developer keys:
27
28 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng
29
30
31 > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
32
33 This is telling you the above public key has not been marked as trusted in
34 your own gpg keyring.
35
36
37 > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
38 > owner.
39
40 This is to be expected, unless you have checked the fingerprint of the
41 imported key yourself against the keys published in the URL I provided above
42 and thereafter edited the key's level of trust to mark it as trusted in your
43 gpg keyring; e.g. you'd need to run:
44
45 gpg --edit-key <KEY ID>
46
47 and follow the options available for this gpg subcommand to edit the key's
48 trust level. This is not necessary for a key you'll only use once, as long as
49 you satisfy yourself the key fingerprint below matches what is published on
50 the RelEng project page.
51
52
53 > Primary key fingerprint: 13EB BDBE DE7A 1277 5DFD B1BA BB57 2E0E
54 > 2D18 2910 Subkey fingerprint: 534E 4209 AB49 EEE1 C19D 9616 2C44 695D B9F6
55 > 043D gpg: WARNING: not a detached signature; file
56 > 'install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS' was NOT verified!
57 >
58 > and:
59 > >sha512sum -c install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc
60 >
61 > install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso: OK
62 > install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso: FAILED
63 > install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.CONTENTS.gz: OK
64 > install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.CONTENTS.gz: FAILED
65 > sha512sum: WARNING: 14 lines are improperly formatted
66 > sha512sum: WARNING: 2 computed checksums did NOT match
67 >
68 >
69 > TIA! :-)
70 > Giorgos.
71 > .
72
73 So the above output checked the sha512 hashes of all listed files and found
74 some to be correct - you can use 'install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso'
75 for your installation. The failed checks above refer to a different hash e.g.
76 sha256.
77
78 HTH.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ISO verification question. "Γιώργος Κωστόπουλος" <giorgosk67@×××××.com>