1 |
Hi Γιώργος, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 20:00:28 GMT Γιώργος Κωστόπουλος wrote: |
4 |
> Hi! :-) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I just downloaded the minimal installation ISO and I was trying the |
7 |
> verification instructions. |
8 |
> I admit that I'm not any kind of gpg expert, so the results are |
9 |
> somewhat confusing to me. |
10 |
> Can someone shed some light on them? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Here's console's output: |
13 |
> >gpg --verify install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc |
14 |
> |
15 |
> gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 22 17:01:06 2020 EET |
16 |
> gpg: using RSA key 534E4209AB49EEE1C19D96162C44695DB9F6043D |
17 |
> gpg: Good signature from "Gentoo Linux Release Engineering (Automated |
18 |
> Weekly Release Key) <releng@g.o>" [unknown] |
19 |
|
20 |
This is telling you the 'install-amd64- |
21 |
minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc' file which contains hashes of the |
22 |
various files listed in it, has a valid signature - i.e. the hashes of these |
23 |
files have not been tampered with and they have been signed by the owner of |
24 |
the Gentoo Release Engineering key. |
25 |
|
26 |
Have a look here for the published developer keys: |
27 |
|
28 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! |
32 |
|
33 |
This is telling you the above public key has not been marked as trusted in |
34 |
your own gpg keyring. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the |
38 |
> owner. |
39 |
|
40 |
This is to be expected, unless you have checked the fingerprint of the |
41 |
imported key yourself against the keys published in the URL I provided above |
42 |
and thereafter edited the key's level of trust to mark it as trusted in your |
43 |
gpg keyring; e.g. you'd need to run: |
44 |
|
45 |
gpg --edit-key <KEY ID> |
46 |
|
47 |
and follow the options available for this gpg subcommand to edit the key's |
48 |
trust level. This is not necessary for a key you'll only use once, as long as |
49 |
you satisfy yourself the key fingerprint below matches what is published on |
50 |
the RelEng project page. |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
> Primary key fingerprint: 13EB BDBE DE7A 1277 5DFD B1BA BB57 2E0E |
54 |
> 2D18 2910 Subkey fingerprint: 534E 4209 AB49 EEE1 C19D 9616 2C44 695D B9F6 |
55 |
> 043D gpg: WARNING: not a detached signature; file |
56 |
> 'install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS' was NOT verified! |
57 |
> |
58 |
> and: |
59 |
> >sha512sum -c install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.DIGESTS.asc |
60 |
> |
61 |
> install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso: OK |
62 |
> install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso: FAILED |
63 |
> install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.CONTENTS.gz: OK |
64 |
> install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso.CONTENTS.gz: FAILED |
65 |
> sha512sum: WARNING: 14 lines are improperly formatted |
66 |
> sha512sum: WARNING: 2 computed checksums did NOT match |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> TIA! :-) |
70 |
> Giorgos. |
71 |
> . |
72 |
|
73 |
So the above output checked the sha512 hashes of all listed files and found |
74 |
some to be correct - you can use 'install-amd64-minimal-20201222T005811Z.iso' |
75 |
for your installation. The failed checks above refer to a different hash e.g. |
76 |
sha256. |
77 |
|
78 |
HTH. |