1 |
Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> Am 25.12.2012 18:15, schrieb Dale: |
3 |
>> Florian Philipp wrote: |
4 |
>>> Am 25.12.2012 16:41, schrieb Mark Knecht: |
5 |
>>>> Hi, |
6 |
>>>> Merry Christmas to all. |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Upgrading an external USB2 drive at home this Christmas morning to |
9 |
>>>> 1TB for more video storage space. One large partition, non-raid, files |
10 |
>>>> are around 1GB. The drive holds only static video files that get |
11 |
>>>> written once and don't change or get erased. No MythTV stuff or |
12 |
>>>> anything like that. |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> This disk reside on my main desktop machine and gets backed up |
15 |
>>>> every couple of days to another USB2 drive (FAT formatted |
16 |
>>>> unfortunately) which attaches to the TV. |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> With the previous local drive I used ext3 and have had no problems. |
19 |
>>>> I'm just wondering if there's a better choice & why. |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> Cheers, |
22 |
>>>> Mark |
23 |
>>>> |
24 |
>>> Ext4 offers better performance for large files. This is especially |
25 |
>>> notable when you remove them but other operations are faster, too. XFS |
26 |
>>> would be the traditional large-file choice but since the arrival of |
27 |
>>> Ext4, I don't see a point in putting up with its quirks anymore. |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> Regards, |
30 |
>>> Florian Philipp |
31 |
>>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> For those who keep up with my adventures, I use ext4 for my home |
34 |
>> directory which has a LOT of videos. Some videos are small and some are |
35 |
>> large but I can say this, it is really fast. No fragmentation either. |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> I also use ext4 for my backup drive. I accidentally deleted some stuff |
38 |
>> one day and I can say this, it is VERY fast. I'm just glad it was only |
39 |
>> a backup. |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>> I would second the idea for ext4. It works great for me. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> Dale |
44 |
>> |
45 |
> On an amusing side note: I once was very happy that I happened to be |
46 |
> running ext3 at work. I accidentally started `rm -rf ~/*` and after more |
47 |
> than a minute I wondered why my disk was so busy ... |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Anyway, thanks to its slow speed, rm only had time to eat away my rather |
50 |
> unimportant "archive" and "bin" directories and hasn't reached "doc" |
51 |
> yet. Thankfully bash sorts its glob expansions alphabetically. :D |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Regards, |
54 |
> Florian Philipp |
55 |
> |
56 |
|
57 |
Mine only had a few seconds, it was ALL gone. I hit the ctrl C just |
58 |
about the time the prompt came back. Well, I got to make new backups. |
59 |
lol Almost 1Tb of stuff too. |
60 |
|
61 |
Dale |
62 |
|
63 |
:-) :-) |
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |