Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library?
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 19:46:49
Message-Id: 50DA024E.3070107@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library? by Florian Philipp
1 Florian Philipp wrote:
2 > Am 25.12.2012 18:15, schrieb Dale:
3 >> Florian Philipp wrote:
4 >>> Am 25.12.2012 16:41, schrieb Mark Knecht:
5 >>>> Hi,
6 >>>> Merry Christmas to all.
7 >>>>
8 >>>> Upgrading an external USB2 drive at home this Christmas morning to
9 >>>> 1TB for more video storage space. One large partition, non-raid, files
10 >>>> are around 1GB. The drive holds only static video files that get
11 >>>> written once and don't change or get erased. No MythTV stuff or
12 >>>> anything like that.
13 >>>>
14 >>>> This disk reside on my main desktop machine and gets backed up
15 >>>> every couple of days to another USB2 drive (FAT formatted
16 >>>> unfortunately) which attaches to the TV.
17 >>>>
18 >>>> With the previous local drive I used ext3 and have had no problems.
19 >>>> I'm just wondering if there's a better choice & why.
20 >>>>
21 >>>> Cheers,
22 >>>> Mark
23 >>>>
24 >>> Ext4 offers better performance for large files. This is especially
25 >>> notable when you remove them but other operations are faster, too. XFS
26 >>> would be the traditional large-file choice but since the arrival of
27 >>> Ext4, I don't see a point in putting up with its quirks anymore.
28 >>>
29 >>> Regards,
30 >>> Florian Philipp
31 >>>
32 >>
33 >> For those who keep up with my adventures, I use ext4 for my home
34 >> directory which has a LOT of videos. Some videos are small and some are
35 >> large but I can say this, it is really fast. No fragmentation either.
36 >>
37 >> I also use ext4 for my backup drive. I accidentally deleted some stuff
38 >> one day and I can say this, it is VERY fast. I'm just glad it was only
39 >> a backup.
40 >>
41 >> I would second the idea for ext4. It works great for me.
42 >>
43 >> Dale
44 >>
45 > On an amusing side note: I once was very happy that I happened to be
46 > running ext3 at work. I accidentally started `rm -rf ~/*` and after more
47 > than a minute I wondered why my disk was so busy ...
48 >
49 > Anyway, thanks to its slow speed, rm only had time to eat away my rather
50 > unimportant "archive" and "bin" directories and hasn't reached "doc"
51 > yet. Thankfully bash sorts its glob expansions alphabetically. :D
52 >
53 > Regards,
54 > Florian Philipp
55 >
56
57 Mine only had a few seconds, it was ALL gone. I hit the ctrl C just
58 about the time the prompt came back. Well, I got to make new backups.
59 lol Almost 1Tb of stuff too.
60
61 Dale
62
63 :-) :-)
64
65 --
66 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!