1 |
On 2013-07-31 8:41 AM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 31/07/13 at 08:30am, Tanstaafl wrote: |
3 |
>> So, how should this be used to 'opt out of systemd completely'? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> from main make.conf |
6 |
> "Use this variable if you want to selectively prevent certain |
7 |
> files from being copied into your file system tree. .." |
8 |
> |
9 |
> You can use it to prevent ebuilds from installing unit files |
10 |
> or open-rc scripts from doing so (based on what you want to opt-out of). |
11 |
|
12 |
Well, no offense, but that is gobbledy-greek to non programmers. |
13 |
|
14 |
I would have no idea *how* to 'prevent ebuilds from installing unit |
15 |
files...'. |
16 |
|
17 |
If this really is 'the one true way' to 'totally opt out of systemd', |
18 |
then in my opinion there should be a very thorough example of *how* to |
19 |
'opt out of systemd' included in the man page. |
20 |
|
21 |
Side-question... |
22 |
|
23 |
I'm wondering if one of the reasons that the dev who was making such a |
24 |
big deal of this was mainly concerned about the 'slipper slope' factor, |
25 |
and saw some writing on the wall that the systemd devs were just playing |
26 |
nice just to get their foot in the door, then were going to pull some |
27 |
tricks to force changes that would eventually result in *everyone* (even |
28 |
those using eudev) to *have* to switch to systemd some time in the future? |
29 |
|
30 |
Not saying this is how it is, but I'm more than a bit concerned about this. |