| 1 |
Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hmm, this article suggests that XFS is the best thing since sliced bread . . . |
| 4 |
> especially for files greater than 500MB. Not sure I've got many of these. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Has anyone got a particularly good experience with XFS vs e.g. Reiserfs? What |
| 7 |
> about JFS? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I have used xfs on 2 Gentoo servers for the last year of so - several |
| 11 |
power outages, no problems: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
$ df -m |
| 14 |
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 15 |
/dev/md/2 529 94 435 18% / |
| 16 |
/dev/md/0 129 16 114 13% /boot |
| 17 |
/dev/md/3 3911 2060 1852 53% /tmp |
| 18 |
/dev/md/4 3911 473 3439 13% /var |
| 19 |
/dev/md/5 19537 5710 13828 30% /usr |
| 20 |
/dev/md/6 19537 5852 13686 30% /home |
| 21 |
/dev/md/7 104841 41208 63634 40% /data0 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Previous to that I used xfs on Mandake... before 'seeing the light' and |
| 25 |
moving to Gentoo... :-) . |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Conversly my experience with reiserfs has been consistent data |
| 28 |
corruption... so I avoid using it (mind you it's probably fine *now*, |
| 29 |
this was a few years ago). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Mark |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives