Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Best way to copy /* ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:35:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20101228223353.3dc949d8@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Best way to copy /* ? by Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) | ||
| 1 | On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > > Which can be done with the -l option. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars |
| 6 | > links to a file could not be resolved. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | You are right. I was referring to the --one-file-system, which I thought |
| 9 | had -l as the short option, but apparently not. Or has that changed in |
| 10 | the last couple of years? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | I'm Bugs Bunny of Borg. What's up Collective? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Best way to copy /* ? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Best way to copy /* ? | Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) |