| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:55:16PM -0400, Simon Hunt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 04:44:31PM -0700, Keith Dart wrote: |
| 3 |
> > === On Sat, 08/29, Simon Hunt wrote: === |
| 4 |
> > > And you don't get freezes or anything? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > === |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > No, everything seems to be working fine now. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > -- Keith Dart |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Okay, I did everything you said and THANK YOU! I don't get freezes |
| 15 |
> anymore BUT I don't have direct rendering, which means everything is |
| 16 |
> very slow because my CPU is doing all the work (I think that's what it |
| 17 |
> means...). Anyway, here is the Xorg log: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> ... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Okay I got direct rendering to work, I think by removing the intel |
| 22 |
framebuffer from my kernel modules. Now my graphics are definitely |
| 23 |
faster, but not as fast as they once were before I upgraded to the 2.8 |
| 24 |
intel driver series. For instance, Facebook.com on Firefox is much |
| 25 |
slower and laggy. And I've noticed it even in apps like mutt and less in |
| 26 |
gnome-terminal. I haven't experienced any freezes though, and the way it |
| 27 |
was before, it *definitely* would have frozen by now. So any thoughts on |
| 28 |
why it is slower? Do you think it will be faster in subsequent releases? |
| 29 |
I thought uxa was supposed to be better than whatever I had before. |
Archives