1 |
On Saturday 16 August 2014 16:34:23 Poison BL. wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I have friends that vary between liking and tolerating Gnome 3, KDE, |
4 |
> etc. and I can honestly say the only meaningful factor in deciding |
5 |
> what they run has always boiled down to taste. Sit down with each for |
6 |
> a week or three (as your main system, you won't get a real feel for |
7 |
> them if you're not trying to get real work done through them), get |
8 |
> them working as close to your preferences as you can, then judge which |
9 |
> a) took the least work to get there and b) most closely match what you |
10 |
> actually want from them. As an added bonus, poke around for a third |
11 |
> thing to score based on... which gives you the best set of features |
12 |
> you *weren't* looking for but *will* use. |
13 |
|
14 |
Sound advice. |
15 |
|
16 |
Personally I won't touch any of the gnome variants because of the way they |
17 |
hide everything they can from the user. Reminds me of Windows with its we- |
18 |
know-better-than-you attitude. And the last time I looked they wouldn't let me |
19 |
have a clear desktop, insisting on littering it with icons I never use. |
20 |
|
21 |
As Joshua says, though, it's all a matter of taste. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Regards |
25 |
Peter |