1 |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Mark Knecht<markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 06/24/2009 02:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Hi all, |
6 |
>>> Main question is whether there is any change in the way I select |
7 |
>>> the fglrx driver with xorg-server-1.5? |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> I have a big emerge running on one of my MythTV frontends that uses |
10 |
>>> an old 2.6.19 kernel with an old 8.28 ati-driver package. The machine |
11 |
>>> does not use a keyboard or mouse. I cannot update either the kernel or |
12 |
>>> the ati-driver for hardware support reasons. When the emerge is |
13 |
>>> finished in a couple of hours do I need to change the xorg.conf file |
14 |
>>> at all to use the server with the fglrx driver or will it just work? |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> There's a pretty big chance that 8.28 is so old that it does not support |
17 |
>> xorg-server 1.5 at all. That means you can't use xorg-server 1.5. And if |
18 |
>> you're not prepared to update your kernel, then the xorg native driver |
19 |
>> (xf86-video-ati) is out of the question too. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> It looks to me you'll have to keep using the older xorg-server. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Thanks Nikos. I hope that's not the case or I've waster a couple of |
27 |
> hours because emerge didn't stop me from doing this. No messages at |
28 |
> all about anything like too old a kernel or vidieo driver. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> It's almost done so I guess I'll just wait and then see how it goes. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> There is no way to update the kernel as far as I know. The ATI chip |
33 |
> that's in the computer has an S-video output that I need to drive the |
34 |
> TV. After 8.28 ATI stopped supporting S-Video for this chip meaning I |
35 |
> cannot update ati-drivers. To use the 8.28 ati-driver package I'm |
36 |
> forced to use the 2.6.19 kernel. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Believe me, I'd like to update but don't know how to unless I buy a |
39 |
> new video card. I haven't looked in the box in a LONG time but I think |
40 |
> it's possibly PCI only, and then it's also low form factor so it will |
41 |
> probably be pretty hard to find ANY video card to fit it, but maybe |
42 |
> I'll look around in case I have to go that way. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Cheers, |
45 |
> Mark |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
OK, after the reboot fglrx is in memory but Xorg.0.log is complaining |
49 |
about missing symbols: |
50 |
|
51 |
myth12 ~ # uname -a |
52 |
Linux myth12 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 #2 PREEMPT Sat May 19 17:55:30 PDT 2007 |
53 |
i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux |
54 |
myth12 ~ # lsmod | grep fglrx |
55 |
fglrx 390828 0 |
56 |
agpgart 24240 2 fglrx,ati_agp |
57 |
myth12 ~ # |
58 |
|
59 |
(II) LoadModule: "fglrx" |
60 |
|
61 |
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so |
62 |
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: |
63 |
miZeroLineScreenIndex |
64 |
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so |
65 |
(II) UnloadModule: "fglrx" |
66 |
(EE) Failed to load module "fglrx" (loader failed, 7) |
67 |
(EE) No drivers available. |
68 |
|
69 |
Fatal server error: |
70 |
no screens found |
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
Am I completely hosed here? |
74 |
|
75 |
Looking on NewEgg I'm not finding any AGP fanless, low-profile cards |
76 |
yet and I'm not sure the machine supported AGP anyway. I'll have to |
77 |
open the box or find some old docs online. There is one fanless ATI |
78 |
Radeon 9250-based PCI-based card but it's expensive for this |
79 |
application at $90. |
80 |
|
81 |
Looks like it's back to the older xorg-server. |
82 |
|
83 |
- Mark |