From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | ||
Date: | Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:56:25 | ||
Message-Id: | slrnleutdq.eh2.martin@bois.imp.fu-berlin.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably by Andrew Savchenko |
1 | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Another challenge is to make dependency resolution parallel |
4 | |
5 | It's a challange but won't solve the problem: On fast processors |
6 | portage's speed is not so much a big issue. Moreover, the factor |
7 | you can obtain this way is in the (unrealistic) best case at most |
8 | the number of cores. Realistically, on a dual core perhaps the |
9 | factor 1.3 (and at the price of blocking parallel running applications |
10 | correspondingly more). |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us> |