1 |
On 7/5/2013 11:12 PM, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> I since did some googling and it seems I am right and he just thought I |
3 |
> was some know nothing guy he could sell some service too. Anyway, has |
4 |
> anything changed to make Linux more prone to viruses than it used to |
5 |
> be? I read a percentage somewhere that said like 99% of viruses are |
6 |
> windoze only. Is there a indisputable source of information on this? |
7 |
|
8 |
Linux is inherently more secure than Windows, but it isn't so much more |
9 |
secure that only 1% of all viruses can attack it. Virus developers don't |
10 |
have a financial incentive to develop Linux viruses (not enough Linux |
11 |
users, most Linux users knowledgeable about computers, and moral reasons). |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Timur Aydin |