| 1 |
On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 10:47:59 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:05:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Are you setting UEFI to boot from systemd-bootx64.efi or from the |
| 4 |
> > > kernel image? If the former, you don't need a copy of the kernel in |
| 5 |
> > > the ESP. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I could run some tests to find out, but after throwing so much time and |
| 8 |
> > effort into reaching a stable setup (so far), I don't wish to do |
| 9 |
> > anything to it but use it, thanks all the same. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You appear to have set up two alternative boot methods. While they don't |
| 12 |
> conflict, you are adding potential confusion when trying to find out what |
| 13 |
> is wrong. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
All right, I've deleted the systemd directory and the system boots more-or- |
| 16 |
less as expected. The differences from a few months ago are (i) the BIOS |
| 17 |
spends a few seconds flickering the cursor around the screen before showing my |
| 18 |
boot menu; (ii) after I've chosen the image to boot, I see 'SHA256 verified' |
| 19 |
at the top-left of the BIOS's part of the screen, until the kernel takes it |
| 20 |
over. I don't know what to make of those. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Peter. |
Archives