| 1 |
This seems like it should be possible. The potential issue would be how to |
| 2 |
ensure a whole job is printed, before a new job is sent. With a single |
| 3 |
cups process sending to the printer, it should be able to print as jobs get |
| 4 |
prepared. But configuring such might not be possible with current setup... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Sep 13, 2016 09:50, "hw" <hw@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Hi, |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
is it possible to make cups print a job while another job is still |
| 12 |
being processed, on the same printer? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Processing a large job can take quite some time, and the printer is |
| 15 |
idle while the large job is being processed and other, smaller jobs, |
| 16 |
are idly waiting in the queue for the large job to finish. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I want like a maximum of 20 jobs being processed at the same time so |
| 19 |
that the printer can print the ones that have already been processed |
| 20 |
immediately when their processing has finished. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Why should cups be limited to use only one CPU? |
Archives