| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 02:10:28PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> No, actually it doesn't. It just has the same kind of very generic claim |
| 4 |
> that has been repeated several times in this thread (which is "why? |
| 5 |
> because it won't work") and links to an article that explains why some |
| 6 |
> udev rules would silently fail for all this time (for *years* now, I'd |
| 7 |
> guess). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The article does not describe a change introduced with 181, it describes |
| 10 |
> what already happened with previous versions. I am not using >= 181 and |
| 11 |
> I do see the issues the article mentions (it does not break here because |
| 12 |
> I do not have a separate /usr, but I can see some rules that use stuff |
| 13 |
> from /usr). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You have such an obvious lack of understanding, and problem comprehending |
| 16 |
English, we just don't need to post to you anymore. ;) |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
| 19 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
| 20 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
| 21 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
| 22 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
| 23 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |
Archives