| 1 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:22:47 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> > Apologies if I have missed it, but what is wrong with using vanilla |
| 4 |
> > > ext2 for /boot? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > The question is about the kernel mounting / from a multi-device btrfs, |
| 7 |
> > without an initramfs - nothing to do with /boot. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It's a good question all the same, tangential or not. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, and it's what I do on my desktop, which doesn't use UEFI. As we |
| 12 |
migrate to UEFI hardware the question becomes moot as we use FAT |
| 13 |
for /boot, and no longer have to deal with GRUB. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Very funny Scotty.. now beam down my pants! |
Archives