1 |
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: |
2 |
> Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What |
9 |
>>>> matters to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I |
10 |
>>>> don't need a Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system |
11 |
>>>> resources on building one. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>> Try euse -I fortran. |
14 |
>>> If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> Regards |
17 |
>>> Michael |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>> That doesn't appear to work like it should then. I get this: |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> root@fireball / # euse -I fortran |
22 |
>> global use flags (searching: fortran) |
23 |
>> ************************************************************ |
24 |
>> [+ CD ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77) |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Installed packages matching this USE flag: |
27 |
>> sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> local use flags (searching: fortran) |
30 |
>> ************************************************************ |
31 |
>> no matching entries found |
32 |
>> root@fireball / # |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> Thing is, I know a couple packages use it on this rig because I just had |
35 |
>> to recompile them. Cantor and R are two that I recall. |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> Maybe it is because it is not a option in the list? The USE flag that is. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
> Iirc you had problems with -fortran, because you have packages that really |
40 |
> need fortran. My suggestion was for people like Peter, who have no problems |
41 |
> without fortran. It shows only packages which could perform better, if a |
42 |
> fortran compiler is available and otherwise fallback to a C implementation. At |
43 |
> least, I think it does :) |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
>> Dale |
47 |
>> :-) :-) |
48 |
>> |
49 |
> Michael |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
|
53 |
Thing is, I switched it back and programs on here now need fortran to |
54 |
build. So, euse is not reporting it but R and Cantor won't build |
55 |
without fortran. Basically, euse should also report R and cantor but it |
56 |
isn't. If mine isn't reporting that, then Peter's may not either. |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) |