| 1 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> You other mail had this in the attachment: |
| 3 |
>> Section "Device" |
| 4 |
>> Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]" |
| 5 |
>> # Driver "radeon" |
| 6 |
>> Driver "fglrx" |
| 7 |
>> Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "no" |
| 8 |
>> Option "VideoOverlay" "on" |
| 9 |
>> Option "OpenGLOverlay" "off" |
| 10 |
>> # Option "DRI" "on" |
| 11 |
>> EndSection |
| 12 |
> which indicates that you are attempting to use the fglrx x11-driver, and |
| 13 |
> not the radeon x11-driver. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> If you use the CONFIG_RADEON_DRM kernel module, you also need to use |
| 16 |
> the "ati" or "radeon" x11 driver. If your use the fglrx out-of-tree, |
| 17 |
> esclavitud kernel module (at least I think there's a kernel module by this |
| 18 |
> name) you'll alsa need to use the "fglrx" x11 driver. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> You seem to be running into a simple misconfiguration at this point. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm sorry, I've forgotten to modify this line while attaching xorg.conf. |
| 24 |
When I was trying to launch Xorg with radeon driver I obviously |
| 25 |
commented out the "fglrx" driver and uncommented "radeon" driver's line |
| 26 |
- inversely to what I have actually attached. So it should be: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Driver "radeon" |
| 29 |
> # Driver "fglrx" |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
And to make it even more precise - while entering default init level |
| 32 |
fglrx is NOT loaded and radeon is loaded. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Regards, |
| 35 |
Jan |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Mail jan at stepien com pl |
| 39 |
Jabber jano at jabber aster pl |
| 40 |
GG 1894343 |
| 41 |
Web http://stepien.com.pl |
Archives