| 1 |
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:47:31 +0000 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:41:09 +0200, Thanasis wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > <sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.11 |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Of course if all 3.10 kernels are removed from the tree then this will |
| 9 |
> > > pull in a wrong kernel, but I *think* that's valid world file |
| 10 |
> > > syntax... |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I don't know if what you're suggesting would work, yet if you noticed as |
| 14 |
> > I wrote in the first place, I would also like to pull in the *latest* |
| 15 |
> > gentoo-sources, *independently* of any specific series/subseries. |
| 16 |
> > Do you think it would work? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I think it would, I used to have a general gentoo-sources plus specific |
| 19 |
> versions in world before it was possible to use sets to stop older |
| 20 |
> kernels being depcleaned. If you have the above line plus an unversioned |
| 21 |
> atom, I think you should get something close to what you want. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Of course, there's an easy way to tell if it would work... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yeah sorry, I should have been clearer, I meant with two separate atoms. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- Khumba |
Archives