| 1 |
On Thursday 23 June 2011 23:30:04 Peter Humphrey did opine thusly: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 22 June 2011 23:35:37 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Maybe we have something different then. I don't have |
| 4 |
> > blas-reference on here anymore either. My point was, disabling |
| 5 |
> > fortran to remove it only lead to other stuff being required. |
| 6 |
> > I think there is more on here now than there was before. So, |
| 7 |
> > removing fortran to get rid of bloat didn't help any because it |
| 8 |
> > just required a different set of bloat. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Maybe it's time to make a backup, then remove all USE flags from |
| 11 |
> make.conf and package.use, set your profile to |
| 12 |
> default/linux/<arch>/10.0/desktop/kde and rebuild. Alan and Neil's |
| 13 |
> idea of a set of the meta-packages you want sounds good to me too. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Then you'll really have a clean system. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You will have whatever system the profile maintainer thinks the |
| 18 |
average user should have, bloated to whatever degree said maintainer |
| 19 |
thinks is a good idea. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
No USE flags set does not mean no options set, it means default. And |
| 22 |
default sets plenty flags ON |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> I may follow suit - I built this system with kde-meta for |
| 25 |
> simplicity, but of course it now has a lot of stuff I don't want, |
| 26 |
> including Fortran. I tried rebuilding with -fortran as I said a few |
| 27 |
> minutes ago, but portage wanted ifc instead. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
kde-meta gives you all the stuff that's useful on the average system, |
| 30 |
plus all of accessibility, kdebindings, kdeedu, games, the sdk, toys |
| 31 |
and maybe even webdev. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I can't think of the kind of user that truly does actually need all of |
| 34 |
that. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives