1 |
Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
2 |
> On 2012-12-25, Bruce Hill wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 02:10:28PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
5 |
>>> No, actually it doesn't. It just has the same kind of very generic claim |
6 |
>>> that has been repeated several times in this thread (which is "why? |
7 |
>>> because it won't work") and links to an article that explains why some |
8 |
>>> udev rules would silently fail for all this time (for *years* now, I'd |
9 |
>>> guess). |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> The article does not describe a change introduced with 181, it describes |
12 |
>>> what already happened with previous versions. I am not using >= 181 and |
13 |
>>> I do see the issues the article mentions (it does not break here because |
14 |
>>> I do not have a separate /usr, but I can see some rules that use stuff |
15 |
>>> from /usr). |
16 |
>> You have such an obvious lack of understanding, and problem comprehending |
17 |
>> English, we just don't need to post to you anymore. ;) |
18 |
> Please be my guest and explain me in which part of that article is it |
19 |
> said that some behavior *introduced in udev-181* will break systems with |
20 |
> a separate /usr. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Quoting from Gentoo news item: |
25 |
|
26 |
root@fireball / # eselect news read 2 |
27 |
2012-03-16-udev-181-unmasking |
28 |
Title udev-181 unmasking |
29 |
Author William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
30 |
Posted 2012-03-16 |
31 |
Revision 1 |
32 |
|
33 |
udev-181 is being unmasked on 2012-03-19. |
34 |
|
35 |
This news item is to inform you that once you upgrade to a version of |
36 |
udev >=181, if you have /usr on a separate partition, you must boot your |
37 |
system with an initramfs which pre-mounts /usr. |
38 |
|
39 |
An initramfs which does this is created by |
40 |
>=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25.1 or |
41 |
>=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be |
42 |
sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr. |
43 |
|
44 |
Also, if you are using OpenRC, you must upgrade to >= openrc-0.9.9. |
45 |
|
46 |
For more information on why this has been done, see the following URL: |
47 |
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
48 |
|
49 |
root@fireball / # |
50 |
|
51 |
Now are you saying the Gentoo devs are lying to us? Careful now. Could |
52 |
end up on a slippery slope and bump your head. That says anything BEFORE |
53 |
181 boots fine with a separate /usr, 181 or anything after does not. |
54 |
Simple enough for you yet? |
55 |
|
56 |
I might add, I have ALWAYS had a separate /usr. Darn near a decade |
57 |
now. It has never failed to boot because /usr was on a separate |
58 |
partition. NOT ONCE. Now I am told it is going to fail. Go figure. |
59 |
Go try to tell me that it was broken all these years. Yea, right. |
60 |
That's like telling me the Sun comes up in the west when I can see it |
61 |
doesn't with my own two eyes. Good luck with that. Reminds me of |
62 |
that"tell it to the hand" thing. ROFL |
63 |
|
64 |
Dale |
65 |
|
66 |
:-) :-) |
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |