Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: best practice for kernel mainteneance
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:59:48
Message-Id: ggpbhm$trh$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] best practice for kernel mainteneance by Thanasis
1 Thanasis wrote:
2 > The question is:
3 > Am I supposed/ should I upgrade when a new source tree becomes stable?
4
5 From a security point of view, you're supposed to upgrade the kernel as
6 soon as a release is made upstream. When a security fix is made
7 upstream, the vulnerability in question has been disclosed and any
8 machines not updated to that version are considered vulnerable.
9
10 This means that the package will probably be in ~arch in portage and not
11 marked stable until it's tested for 30 days or more. So "unstable" (in
12 portage terms) kernels are more secure then stable ones simply because
13 they're the latest available.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: best practice for kernel maintenance Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>