1 |
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
2 |
> Michael Crute wrote: |
3 |
> > On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
4 |
> >> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> >> > Which is the best for organization mail server. |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is |
11 |
> > arguably THE MOST secure mail server |
12 |
> > (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Actually, it is NOT. DJB made this statement but he doesn't |
15 |
> stand to it. See http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html |
16 |
> for a quite big collection of bugs and RFC violations of qmail. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> To quote from that page: |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I |
22 |
think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by |
23 |
Postfix's author. |
24 |
|
25 |
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/venema.html |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
________________________________ |
29 |
Michael E. Crute |
30 |
http://mike.crute.org |
31 |
|
32 |
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended |
33 |
up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |