| 1 |
On May 29, 2012 12:53 AM, "pk" <peterk2@××××××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 2012-05-28 05:44, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > But my newer servers has /run (and its children) from the get go, |
| 6 |
because I |
| 7 |
> > think it kind of makes sense. Even though they're udev-free. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Hm... what is using /run instead of /var/run? I thought it was (newish) |
| 10 |
> udev itself and things like systemd that uses /run instead of |
| 11 |
> /var/run... just curious. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Best regards |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Peter K |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Nothing that I know of, then. But I thought if sometime later down the |
| 19 |
road some braindead dev assumes that everyone uses udev and hardwired |
| 20 |
his/her package to assume /run exists, I'm covered :-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rgds, |
Archives