1 |
On Sunday 28 November 2010 17:01:22 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On more business matters, have the ebuilds in enlightenment overlay |
4 |
> successfully installed for you? And has the category for EFL's media libs |
5 |
> settled down? This business of media-libs vs x11-libs caused me huge |
6 |
> amounts of grief about a year ago.... |
7 |
|
8 |
Yes, I remember the media-libs change. I thought it was more recent than that |
9 |
- doesn't time fly! I must have been lucky because I uninstalled/reinstalled |
10 |
affected packages and all was fine with my E17. Bear in mind though that I |
11 |
have not installed all modules - I tend to emerge only what I use/need |
12 |
regularly. |
13 |
|
14 |
This weekend I removed efl and added the enlightenment overlay. Then checked |
15 |
that the following packages were keyworded as -9999, which were (re)installed |
16 |
without any problems:[1] |
17 |
|
18 |
dev-libs/ecore |
19 |
dev-libs/e_dbus |
20 |
dev-libs/eet |
21 |
dev-libs/eina |
22 |
dev-libs/embryo |
23 |
dev-libs/efreet |
24 |
media-libs/edje |
25 |
media-libs/ethumb |
26 |
media-libs/evas |
27 |
x11-wm/enlightenment |
28 |
media-libs/emotion |
29 |
dev-libs/eeze |
30 |
|
31 |
[1] In the process I had to uninstall some efl packages to avoid conflicts. |
32 |
|
33 |
I see that there are loads more packages in enlightenment overlay than what I |
34 |
have installed, but I am not sure if I need them (please let me know if you |
35 |
thing I'm missing out something basic). In time I will be trying more |
36 |
packages out no doubt. |
37 |
|
38 |
I also tried for a few days to switch away from -9999 and into the betas |
39 |
offered by the portage tree - then things got terribly messy and decided to |
40 |
stick with svn for now. |
41 |
|
42 |
So I think that the enlightenment overlay is usable, but as with all SVN |
43 |
things ... YMMV. ;-) |
44 |
-- |
45 |
Regards, |
46 |
Mick |