Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel 2.6.25-r6 oddities; is this kernel really ready for stable?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:19:08
Message-Id: b932915a0807250319u2781d20br538c8e9311dbe759@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel 2.6.25-r6 oddities; is this kernel really ready for stable? by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote:
2
3 >
4 >
5 > But when you ask them about support for the new kernels, the answer is "we
6 > are annoyed by the kernel development process; they change the internal API
7 > all the time, it's annoying."
8 >
9 > I think it's time for the kernel devs to apologize to VMWare and to promise
10 > that they won't be so annoying anymore in the future. We can't let VMWare
11 > getting annoyed, now can we.
12 >
13 >
14 read "stable-api-nonsense.txt" in any kernel source directory. That's the
15 way it works. If VMWare doesn't like it, that's tough. They DO have the
16 option of putting their entire code base in the kernel tree like every other
17 driver that is already there, but they have chosen not to. That's their
18 choice and no-one forced them to do it. Now they have to live with that
19 choice and stop whinging.
20
21 Linux existed long before VMWare came along. It will likely still exist long
22 after VMWare has gone away.
23
24
25 --
26 Alan McKinnon
27 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com

Replies