1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:49:04 +0200 gwe <gwenjo@××××.fr> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> I'm sorry |
6 |
> I post only the end of log file of valgrind (the entire file is very big |
7 |
> ~22500 lines). |
8 |
> This is the result of execute the source code : |
9 |
> ==13767== LEAK SUMMARY: |
10 |
> ==13767== definitely lost: 36 bytes in 1 blocks. |
11 |
> ==13767== indirectly lost: 120 bytes in 10 blocks. |
12 |
> ==13767== possibly lost: 40,264 bytes in 47 blocks. |
13 |
> ==13767== still reachable: 118,673 bytes in 1,963 blocks. |
14 |
> ==13767== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. |
15 |
|
16 |
OK, but memory usage doesn't add up while the program is running, |
17 |
right? I think it may be just the missing call to gtk_exit(EXIT_SUCCESS) |
18 |
instead of return EXITSUCCESS. At least gtk_exit() is supposed to do |
19 |
final cleanup work. |
20 |
|
21 |
But I think this is rather OT for this list. If you don't get more |
22 |
answers here, you may seek help at the GTK project... |
23 |
|
24 |
-hwh |
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |