| 1 |
Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 16 March 2014 17:01:26 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Unless there is already a VG on the other system with the same name. LVM |
| 4 |
>> doesn't handle VG name clashes, yet some distros still give them generic |
| 5 |
>> names. |
| 6 |
> Not sure how others do it, but I find the following naming convention for VGs |
| 7 |
> work: |
| 8 |
> vg_<hostname> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> -- |
| 11 |
> Joost |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's good advice if someone has a lot of systems and moves around a |
| 17 |
lot. Mine would only be if something really bad happened to my main |
| 18 |
rig. Odds are, I won't need to worry about this but just in case it |
| 19 |
does, I may not be able to pop on and ask until after I had to move |
| 20 |
things around. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dale |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
:-) :-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives