| 1 |
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 08:30:02AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 05:28 on Saturday 14 May 2011, Felix Miata did |
| 3 |
> opine thusly: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Is it telling me I have to change my USE from -gtk to +gtk, or can emerging |
| 7 |
> > one of those 8 packages listed satisfy the dep? IOW, it's unclear to me |
| 8 |
> > what "One of the following packages" actually refers to. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It's telling you that you must enable USE=gtk for libcanberra for that build |
| 11 |
> to succeed. The chain of packages listed won't solve the problem, they are |
| 12 |
> causing it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Easiest is to list gtk in USE in make.conf, then everything that uses gtk will |
| 15 |
> link against it. If you are worried about Gnome, this wil not cause gnome to |
| 16 |
> be installed, just gtk+ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
True, just be aware that if you enable gtk *globally* you will end up |
| 20 |
building the gtk interface for absolutely everything which has that |
| 21 |
option. |
| 22 |
Far better (IMO, YMMV) is to use /etc/portage/package.use specify such things |
| 23 |
per package. Unless, of course, you like having a gtk GUI for everything. |
| 24 |
:) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
caveat utilitor |
| 28 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ |
Archives