| 1 |
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:03:36 +0800, ubiquitous1980 wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> That you stated that the root account was hardly locked if I can sudo su |
| 4 |
> into it. If you take me as truthful, then you can see that I have done |
| 5 |
> exactly that: locked the account and sudo su'ed into it. I think you |
| 6 |
> already knew that was possible, so I am countering the semantics of the |
| 7 |
> issue. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
My point was that if you can get into it, it is not truly locked. You |
| 10 |
have prevented one means of accessing it, but not totally locked it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anyway, sudo -i/s is a cleaner way of opening a root session IMO. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Nothing is illegal if one hundred businessmen decide to do it. |
Archives