| 1 |
Le lundi 30 avril 2012 12:59:10 kwkhui@××××.net a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:55:08 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Stephane Guedon <stephane@×××××××××××××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi everyone |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I am now forced to replace my epson printer. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Anyone think of a printer for which ink is quite cheap (contrary to |
| 10 |
> > the epson) and that allow to have status not only in windows ? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Epson as an utility to have ink status in windows and linux, but I |
| 13 |
> > have my printer on a server and was in hope some could have ink |
| 14 |
> > status iin cups ... |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > So, anyone that have a suggestion is welcome ! |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Is it just me? There is a bad GPG signature (maybe it is due to the |
| 19 |
> accent character(s)). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Anyway, IMO hplip is much nicer than mtink (there is the command-line |
| 22 |
> tool hp-level included that displays ink level), and HP ink don't dry |
| 23 |
> up if you leave the printer idle for 2 weeks, unlike Epson. Of course, |
| 24 |
> if you print a lot you should consider laser printer. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Kerwin |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Anyway, I don't print so much, but I need one ! |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I don't know why you say I have a bad gpg. I think I put it on the gpg |
| 31 |
servers, so It should be ok. Did you try to search for it ? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Thanks |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Stéphane Guedon | www.22decembre.eu |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Protegez vos courriers sur internet aussi, utilisez gpg ! |
| 39 |
http://www.22decembre.eu/2012/02/27/proteger-vos-courriels-avec-gpg/ |
Archives