| 1 |
James Stevenson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I was running `emerge --update --newuse --deep @world` this morning and |
| 5 |
> I received a notification that one of my packages had been masked by my |
| 6 |
> profile. Am I correct in thinking that this issue will resolve itself in |
| 7 |
> 30 days? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> !!! The following installed packages are masked: |
| 10 |
> - x11-proto/xextproto-7.3.0-r1::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 11 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
| 12 |
> # Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> (10 Jun 2018) |
| 13 |
> # Packages combined into x11-base/xorg-proto. |
| 14 |
> #All reverse deps transitioned. |
| 15 |
> # Removal in 30 days. Bug #656250 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> - x11-proto/dri2proto-2.8-r2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 18 |
> - x11-proto/xf86driproto-2.1.1-r2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 19 |
> - x11-proto/dri3proto-1.0-r1::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 20 |
> - x11-proto/presentproto-1.1-r1::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 21 |
> - x11-proto/xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1-r2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 22 |
> - x11-proto/glproto-1.4.17-r2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) |
| 23 |
> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge |
| 24 |
> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> All the best, |
| 27 |
> James |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
If my memory serves me correctly, the package you have installed now is |
| 33 |
being included/transitioned in another package. In other words, you |
| 34 |
should be able to uninstall xextproto and the files that were in it are |
| 35 |
now in xorg-proto. It may be that you have to emerge xextproto again or |
| 36 |
it may even require a USE flag change to insure it creates the new files |
| 37 |
from the old package. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
If my memory has failed me, I'm sure someone will come along and correct |
| 40 |
me. ;-) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Dale |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
:-) :-) |
Archives