Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: tuxic@××××××.de
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with backup harddisks
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:08:56
Message-Id: 20200430180839.iz4kxipst2i5stwp@solfire
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with backup harddisks by Andrea Conti
1 On 04/30 03:44, Andrea Conti wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > > > CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
5 > > > CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
6 > > > CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y
7 >
8 > That's all you need.
9 >
10 > > This could be the key. Sector sizes have been changing from 512 to 4096
11 > > over many years. If your kernel has been updated to expect/use 4096 byte
12 > > sectors, it might not be able to read the disk properly.
13 >
14 > Sector size is only a (fixed) property of a specific block device, not something expected or required by the kernel.
15 > Sector sizes other than 512B have been around for ages without any problems, even in consumer hardware (e.g. CDs and DVDs have 2KB sectors).
16 >
17 > > Disklabel type: dos
18 >
19 > > Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
20 > > /dev/sdb1 1 1953458175 1953458175 931.5G ee GPT
21 >
22 > That looks... broken.
23 > fdisk is recognizing the disk as MBR (a GPT disk would have "Disklabel type: gpt"), but the partition table is a protective MBR, which makes no sense in a non-GPT disk.
24 >
25 > My guess is that this disk was at some time partitioned with GPT (possibly it came that way from WD?), but then it was only used in machines with no kernel support for GPT.
26 > Such a machine will happily treat that as a normal MBR and allow you to access the protective entry as a normal partition, which means you can create a filesystem on it and fill it with data, destroying the GPT structures.
27 >
28 > A GPT-aware kernel on the other hand will recognize that as a protective MBR and it will ignore it --but since the disk does not contain any valid GPT structures, it will not show any partitions.
29 >
30 > Try running "gdisk -l /dev/sdb"; for a valid GPT disk it will say:
31 >
32 > Partition table scan:
33 > MBR: protective
34 > BSD: not present
35 > APM: not present
36 > GPT: present
37 >
38 > If that's not the case and you have no GPT, you will have to fix things manually.
39 > Since the disk is only 1TB, there is no reason to use GPT at all, so your best bet is to use fdisk to make that a standard MBR by changing the partition type from 'ee' to '83'.
40 >
41 > andrea
42 >
43
44 Hi Andreas,
45
46 thank you very much for your analysis! :)
47
48 when doing a gdisk -l /dev/sdb I get this Rocky Horror Picture Show:
49
50
51 PT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.5
52
53 Caution: invalid main GPT header, but valid backup; regenerating main header
54 from backup!
55
56 Caution! After loading partitions, the CRC doesn't check out!
57 Warning: Invalid CRC on main header data; loaded backup partition table.
58 Warning! Main and backup partition tables differ! Use the 'c' and 'e' options
59 on the recovery & transformation menu to examine the two tables.
60
61 Warning! One or more CRCs don't match. You should repair the disk!
62 Main header: ERROR
63 Backup header: OK
64 Main partition table: ERROR
65 Backup partition table: ERROR
66
67 Partition table scan:
68 MBR: protective
69 BSD: not present
70 APM: not present
71 GPT: damaged
72
73 ****************************************************************************
74 Caution: Found protective or hybrid MBR and corrupt GPT. Using GPT, but disk
75 verification and recovery are STRONGLY recommended.
76 ****************************************************************************
77 Disk /dev/sdb: 1953458176 sectors, 931.5 GiB
78 Model: Elements 25A2
79 Sector size (logical/physical): 512/512 bytes
80 Disk identifier (GUID): BCA95A74-1E0A-4648-9971-20ED4049CAE5
81 Partition table holds up to 128 entries
82 Main partition table begins at sector 2 and ends at sector 33
83 First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 1953458142
84 Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
85 Total free space is 1953458109 sectors (931.5 GiB)
86
87 Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
88
89
90
91 "fix manually" scares me...especially because I have no place for
92 1TB of an image file to with which I can experiment ...
93
94 Any ideas which could ease my burden and to un-scare my
95 "need to fix it manually" ??? ;) ;)
96
97 Cheers!
98 Meino

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with backup harddisks Wynn Wolf Arbor <wolf@××××××.systems>