| 1 |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:29:19 +0100, Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Unless there is already a VG on the other system with the same name. |
| 4 |
> > LVM doesn't handle VG name clashes, yet some distros still give them |
| 5 |
> > generic names. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Not sure how others do it, but I find the following naming convention |
| 8 |
> for VGs work: |
| 9 |
> vg_<hostname> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I do somethig similar. The thing is, that naming can be easily automated |
| 12 |
by distro installers, so why do they insist on calling every VG vg_000? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's no use crying over spilt milk -- it only makes it salty for the cat. |
Archives