| 1 |
Am 30.08.2016 um 22:46 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Grant Edwards |
| 3 |
> <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> There's nothing in Gentoo that guarantees everybody has ext2 support |
| 5 |
>> in their kernels. That said, I agree that ext2 (or perhaps ext3 with |
| 6 |
>> journalling disabled -- I've always been a bit fuzzy on whether that's |
| 7 |
>> exactly the same thing or not) |
| 8 |
> Sorry, I just wanted to chime in on one thing. While a journal |
| 9 |
> probably will cause more flash wear, it also potentially adds data |
| 10 |
> integrity. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Now consider that the original message that started this whole thread |
| 13 |
> was important files being stored on flash and being corrupted. |
| 14 |
> Getting rid of the journal might not be the best move. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Unless you have a LOT of writes to flash you're not going to wear it |
| 17 |
> out, especially with wear-leveling algorithms. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Oh, and finally, if it matters that much, have a backup... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
the journal does not add any data integrity benefits at all. It just |
| 23 |
makes it more likely that the fs is in a sane state if there is a crash. |
| 24 |
Likely. Not a guarantee. Your data? No one cares. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If you want an fs that cares about your data: zfs. |
Archives