1 |
On 29/11/2014 08:14, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> After your email I read the output of dmesg more precisely ... and now |
4 |
> knowing (due to your post :) what to look for and found that |
5 |
> the detection of another usb-ethernet-device attached to my PC created |
6 |
> another usb<n> (first: usb0, second: usb1). |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I put the first Arietta into the net 192.168.10.x and the second |
9 |
> Arietta into net 192.168.11.x and do two different ifconfig for usb0 |
10 |
> and the other one for usb1 and TADA! - I could ssh into both! |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This is not THAT elegant (wasting a complete subnet), but it proofes, |
13 |
> that both boards are /relly/ ok... |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
In truth you are not wasting a complete subnet (whatever that is), you |
17 |
have merely specified a range 256 times larger than what you want to have. |
18 |
|
19 |
In networking you are not limited to ranges that end on an octet |
20 |
boundary (we got rid of *that* limitation 10+ years ago). Instead just |
21 |
do this: |
22 |
|
23 |
board #1: 192.168.0.100/32 |
24 |
board #2: 192.168.0.101/32 |
25 |
|
26 |
Now you have specified "subnet" that are each exactly one ip address |
27 |
wide. All modern software know what to do with this. |
28 |
|
29 |
Adapt the addresses to your own network design and you should be good to go. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
Alan |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Alan McKinnon |
39 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |