From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) | ||
Date: | Mon, 27 May 2013 08:15:20 | ||
Message-Id: | 201305270914.55098.michaelkintzios@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) by Nick Khamis |
1 | On Monday 27 May 2013 01:16:31 Nick Khamis wrote: |
2 | > By downstream, I mean within our own network. Obviously downstream LB |
3 | > from the ISP's DSLAM would be impossible without MLPP, BGP support... |
4 | > |
5 | > N |
6 | |
7 | I think that the CONFIG_BONDING option in the kernel will help you do what you |
8 | want. Have a look at /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt |
9 | |
10 | http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-bond-or-team-multiple-network-interfaces-nic-into-single-interface.html |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | Without bonding, using Trivial/True link equaliser (teql) you could try |
14 | something like this: |
15 | |
16 | http://compton.nu/2009/12/per-packet-load-balancing-with-linux/ |
17 | |
18 | http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.loadshare.html |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | From a cursory look the kernel bonding seems to be the latest method of doing |
22 | this. Please let us know what you come up with as the best method for |
23 | achieving what you want. |
24 | -- |
25 | Regards, |
26 | Mick |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |