Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nils Freydank <nils.freydank@××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 18:47:10
Message-Id: 1890157.QvHYgToqfP@pygoscelis
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet by R0b0t1
1 On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 19:11:28 CEST, R0b0t1:
2 > [...]
3 > It might not matter for anyone on this list, but it seems like GCC 6
4 > doesn't support hardening properly. I'm kind of disappointed that they
5 > seem to want to skip it but I can understand the amount of work they
6 > might be avoiding.
7
8 Could you please specify what kind of hardening isn’t supported? On
9 #gentoo-hardened on Freenode IRC I got the information that gcc includes
10 now patches that had to be patched by Gentoo in earlier versions. Therefore
11 -no{pie,ssp,ssppie}-subprofiles don’t exist anymore.
12
13 checksec’s[1] output didn’t change neither to something less hardened.
14
15 [1] =app-admin/checksec-1.7.5::gentoo
16
17
18 Greetings,
19 Nils
20
21 PS: Testing gcc-7.1.0 on ~amd64/hardened right now.
22
23 --
24 GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B'
25 Nils Freydank

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature