Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:50:25
Message-Id: 4E0486D1.20703@kutulu.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Todd Goodman
1 On 6/24/2011 8:03 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
2 > * Mike Edenfield<kutulu@××××××.org> [110623 18:34]:
3
4 >> It's one package (cantor) that has one dependency (R) that is optional
5 >> (USE=-R) that falls squarely into the "if you aren't sure if you need it
6 >> then you probably don't" category. So for most users, no, you don't need
7
8 > What seems strange then is that if everyone keeps telling Dale that he
9 > most likely doesn't need cantor and R then why is R enabled in the
10 > profile by default?
11
12 It's not enabled in the profile, it's enabled in the ebuild:
13
14 IUSE="debug ps +R"
15
16 and likely for the same reason there's a scary warning. If
17 you're installing cantor, because you plan to use it (and
18 not because kde-meta is a bloat monster), you need one of
19 the two backends to make it work. R is the preferred option
20 there, so the cantor maintainers assume "if you want cantor,
21 you probably want R", and the cascade begins.
22
23 --Mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Todd Goodman <tsg@×××××××××.net>