1 |
On Saturday 31 July 2010 19:04:47 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 31 July 2010 16:33:18 Dale wrote: |
4 |
> > > Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
5 |
> > > > Dnia 2010-07-31, o godz. 16:15:51 |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > Volker Armin Hemmann<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> napisał(a): |
8 |
> > > >> On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
9 |
> > > >>> Hi, |
10 |
> > > >>> |
11 |
> > > >>> My problem is really strange - I can't access my hard drive from |
12 |
> > > >>> linux, but it works from windows without problems. It has some bad |
13 |
> > > >>> blocks. |
14 |
> > > >> |
15 |
> > > >> it has a lot of bad blocks and a fucked up firmware it seems. No way |
16 |
> > > >> it is working 'without problems'. |
17 |
> > > > |
18 |
> > > > Well total space taken by bad blocks according to chkdsk is less than |
19 |
> > > > 1MB, windows is still able to access all data. Linux is only able to |
20 |
> > > > see partition table "for a while" - as you can see in dmesg. |
21 |
> > > > |
22 |
> > > > If firmware is broken then how it is possible that windows is able to |
23 |
> > > > use this disk? |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > Maybe windoze is ignoring the problem? It's not like windoze has never |
26 |
> > > done that before right? |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > Just a thought. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > Couldn't it be that the MSWindows partition has no bad blocks, while |
31 |
> > Linux does? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> it is not about partitions. |
34 |
|
35 |
Please explain, I thought that bad blocks would coincide with some partitions. |
36 |
-- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
Mick |