| 1 |
On Montag, 5. Mai 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have two 2.5in HD's, one 60Gb with a heap of bad sectors currently |
| 5 |
> used in external Hd enclosure, and one 100Gb which seems in good |
| 6 |
> condition, currently in my laptop. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm upgrading my laptop, and I'd like to turn the old one into a myth |
| 9 |
> frontend or something similar, so I want to put the 60Gb in it. I will |
| 10 |
> then use the 100Gb in my external enclosure for travelling, backups, |
| 11 |
> etc. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The reason the 60Gb has bad sectors (I think) is because I dropped it |
| 14 |
> (in it's enclosure). This was quite some time ago, and it doesn't seem |
| 15 |
> to be dying any further, but I haven't done any comparisons on the bad |
| 16 |
> sector count. I use nearly 100% of the space available, and regularly |
| 17 |
> compare cksums, so if anything was deteriorating, I would know. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The question is: should I use it at all (for any use, external HD or |
| 20 |
> internal with operating system), or is it sufficient to let the fsck |
| 21 |
> tool mark the bad sectors and just keep using it? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
badblocks & mkfs. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Maybe. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
And the 'monitoring tool' would be smartmontools. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
But I wouldn't trust a harddisk that got damaged in a drop. |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives