| 1 |
I doubt that could ever work. How would you deal with an ebuild moving from |
| 2 |
unstable to stable? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 27 May 2010 2:22 AM, <meino.cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Hi, |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
is there any reasonable way to keep any "stable" |
| 10 |
installation (those done without using "~x86" in |
| 11 |
package.keywords) in /usr while anything installed |
| 12 |
as "unstable" (using "~x86) under /usr/local ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
best regards, |
| 15 |
mcc |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments |
| 19 |
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. |
| 20 |
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
| 21 |
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows. |
Archives