1 |
On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300 |
2 |
Arttu V. wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 5/23/10, David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi Arttu, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but |
8 |
> > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Next idea, how about just marking a single arch: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" |
15 |
|
16 |
Wonder how that got there? I must have been in a creative mood |
17 |
when I did that. |
18 |
|
19 |
The extra arch has been removed, but didn't help matters ... |
20 |
|
21 |
> I don't know if the java ebuilds, eclasses and wrapper-scripts are |
22 |
> wise enough to figure out the correct dependencies with such keywords. |
23 |
> I could imagine some part might figure out the arch as x86, but then |
24 |
> your system vm would be set to the x86_64 vm, i.e., no x86 system vm |
25 |
> set ... (again, just some more wild speculation ;) ) |
26 |
|
27 |
Have started "emerge -auNDtqv world". Emerge has found a bunch of |
28 |
packages to downgrade, including several java related ones. I'll |
29 |
report back later (after a family picnic this afternoon). |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
|
33 |
David |