Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <lists@××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:40:56
Message-Id: 4ACF83AC.5090608@f_philipp.fastmail.net
1 Hi list!
2
3 Does this output from /proc/cpuinfo make any sense:
4
5 processor : 0
6 vendor_id : GenuineIntel
7 cpu family : 6
8 model : 26
9 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz
10 stepping : 5
11 cpu MHz : 141.318
12 cache size : 8192 KB
13 physical id : 1
14 siblings : 8
15 core id : 0
16 cpu cores : 4
17 apicid : 16
18 fpu : yes
19 fpu_exception : yes
20 cpuid level : 11
21 wp : yes
22 flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
23 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
24 nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2
25 cx16 xtpr popcnt lahf_lm
26 bogomips : 4525.39
27 clflush size : 64
28 cache_alignment : 64
29 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
30 power management: [8]
31
32 [...]
33
34 Shouldn't the E5520 be Nehalem based and therefore have a flag for ssse3
35 and sse4?
36
37 Could the missing flags be related to a too old kernel (2.6.18)?
38
39 Thanks in advance!
40
41 Florian Philipp

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo Keith Dart <keith@×××××××××.biz>
Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo Renat Golubchyk <ragermany@×××.net>