Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Caveman Al Toraboran <toraboracaveman@××××××××××.com>
To: "gentoo-user@l.g.o" <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:16:23
Message-Id: LFBGxuFLclY0Odcxs8XQQsBJXghiLkr3RNoKtwLL0lJSlAGRyc6daxisswaKI_VI81FiaP7VJo_yOdDbYQqLxaBCDrU09UqyjKP8O861jmU=@protonmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Michele Alzetta
1 On Friday, April 24, 2020 9:56 PM, Michele Alzetta <michele.alzetta@×××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > I mean, basically portage is just a set of functions, so a functional programming language might just be the best way to go
4
5 yes, haskell passes step (1); so does php,
6 java, etc. now kindly apply the rest of the steps
7 ((2) and (3)), and see how far haskell would reach?
8
9 i don't think haskell would pass step (2), and
10 even if does, i doubt it would survive step (3).
11
12 unless you're seriously asking this question,
13 you're committing a strawman.