Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage is proposing an ncurses update and I don't understand what it means
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 06:51:56
Message-Id: 20150902075141.5a8cea47@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Portage is proposing an ncurses update and I don't understand what it means by walt
1 On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:06:05 -0700, walt wrote:
2
3 > Calculating dependencies... done!
4 > [ebuild U ] sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5 [5.9-r3]
5 > [ebuild NS ] sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r99 [5.9-r3] USE="cxx gpm unicode
6 > -ada -static-libs -tinfo" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)"
7 >
8 > Is this going to install two different (slotted) versions of ncurses-5.9
9 > on my stable machine?
10 >
11 > If not, then this proposed update must be an experiment or a hack or a
12 > workaround of some kind. On my *stable* machine!
13
14 It's a workaround, not an experiment as it's been tested for over a week.
15 It's to get round an issue with subslots and some ebuilds not handling
16 changes as expected (I won't say incorrectly as there seems to be some
17 dispute over exactly what is defined in the PMS).AIUI the second ebuild
18 simply depends on the first, so that all the ebuilds requiring ncurses
19 work properly.
20
21 See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558952 for more information,
22 probably more than you want to read.
23
24
25 --
26 Neil Bothwick
27
28 For security reasons, all text in this mail
29 is double-rot13 encrypted.

Replies