Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: microcai <microcai@×××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 08:33:33
Message-Id: CAMgqO2xMqKf30KK7fjOLYy1MBiTj1CXXhkpW96QPjm-wa7M6Ow@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 by Michael Mol
1 2012/5/29 Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
2
3 > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
4 > >
5 > > On May 29, 2012 4:15 AM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> wrote:
6 > >>
7 > >> Am 2012-05-28 22:54, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
8 > >> > On Monday, 28. May 2012 22:04:30 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
9 > >> >> As GCC-4.7.0 appeared for ~amd64 now ...
10 > >> >>
11 > >> >> anyone recompiled system or world with it already?
12 > >> >>
13 > >> >> More advantages or disadvantages?
14 > >> >
15 > >> > I tried an emerge -ev world yesterday (on a box with a total about
16 > 1100
17 > >> > emergeed packages), so far only had compiling trouble with
18 > >> > gst-pluings-ffmpeg
19 > >> > (gcc4.7.0 bug including patch is on b.g.o[1], so was easy to solve)
20 > and
21 > >> > firefox 12.
22 > >> >
23 > >> > All of KDE 4.8.3 and libreoffice did emerge nicely. Though i did not
24 > >> > test the
25 > >> > results yet.
26 > >> >
27 > >> > SaCu
28 > >> >
29 > >> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407741
30 > >> >
31 > >>
32 > >>
33 > >> Thanks alot, Sascha, for that helpful feedback!
34 > >>
35 > >> I will give it a try on one of my machines tonight.
36 > >>
37 > >> In gentoo-ricer-terms: did you notice any improvements?
38 > >>
39 > >> ;-)
40 > >>
41 > >
42 > > LOL
43 > >
44 > > Yeah, I am also wondering how much improvement graphite sees with 4.7.0
45 > >
46 > > *shuffles over to gcc changelog
47 >
48 > I'm mostly looking forward to Bulldozer support and RDRAND.
49 >
50 >
51 LOL I thought no one buys it
52
53
54 > --
55 > :wq
56 >
57 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>