1 |
Joerg Schilling ha scritto: |
2 |
> Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I'll be as direct as possible. Please, do the same. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I've read your site but I could not find the info I'm looking for. |
8 |
>> Please, quote the following two lines and provide the relevant text |
9 |
>> under each of them. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> ==================== |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Line 1: Why do you think there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> ==================== |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Line 2: Full quotation of the lawyers' conclusion |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> ==================== |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Why do you start a new round and why are you now asking for completely |
22 |
> different things? |
23 |
|
24 |
He's not asking different things. |
25 |
Quotes from his mail: |
26 |
" - When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why |
27 |
there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the |
28 |
most interesting part)" |
29 |
|
30 |
" - The exact statement of the lawyers you consulted" |
31 |
|
32 |
Now, if you want to be taken seriously, please answer to these |
33 |
questions. We have asked them several times. Why do you dance around |
34 |
them and never answer them? They should be very easy to answer, if your |
35 |
position is so solid. |
36 |
|
37 |
> Did you read the GPL to understand what the GPL allows? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> No non-GPL source is based on or derived from GPL code. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> If you claim that there is a problem, it would be _you_ who needs to prove this |
42 |
> claim. |
43 |
|
44 |
What do you not understand of the word "explain", Joerg? |
45 |
|
46 |
m. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |